What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
safe distance from cell tower define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.