What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. safe distance from cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For safe distance from cell tower , a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.