Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. https://canvas.instructure.com/eportfolios/1972781/Home/Is_there_any_harm_coming_from_5g can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
safe distance from cell tower for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.