Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.